- #RUN WINDOWS ON MAC PARALLELS VS VMWARE MAC OS X#
- #RUN WINDOWS ON MAC PARALLELS VS VMWARE MAC OS#
- #RUN WINDOWS ON MAC PARALLELS VS VMWARE INSTALL#
In contrast, Parallels provides the ability to specify more granular virtual hardware information as well as the use of a disk image to mimic the functionality of a floppy drive. This makes working between the two operating systems much more seamless. One of those is clipboard support, allowing you to copy and paste between Mac and Windows applications. Parallels also offers a couple of features that make it more user-friendly than Fusion. This is one of the few places where Fusion truly delivers something that every user will appreciate that Parallels does not, though this feature is slated for the next version of Parallels’ software, Desktop 2. But, as with the shared folders feature, I found that it did not always function properly. This is actually a much easier method than setting up shared folders, and it can be used without having to configure anything.
#RUN WINDOWS ON MAC PARALLELS VS VMWARE MAC OS#
VMware delivers another option to accessing files between operating systems with its support for drag and drop of files and folders between virtual machines and Mac OS X. The shared folders technique used in both applications is solid, though it took me a couple of reinstalls of the VMware Tools to get this to function properly in Fusion.
#RUN WINDOWS ON MAC PARALLELS VS VMWARE MAC OS X#
With their respective tool sets installed under Windows, users can easily move between the Windows and Mac OS X environments. Most users will find both Fusion and Parallels easy to use and will probably never even need to adjust the configuration settings from their defaults. (Parallels’ scores for graphics performance are almost double those of Fusion.) The most likely cause for these differences is explained in a Fusion alert dialog that informs users that it is running in a debug mode that reduces performance and that can’t be disabled in the current release.
Running benchmark tests within similarly configured virtual machines under each application reveals dramatic differences in some processor and graphics functions.
#RUN WINDOWS ON MAC PARALLELS VS VMWARE INSTALL#
Although the time it takes to install or boot Windows or to run most applications is similar between both Parallels and Fusion, some actions that involve redrawing the screen are slower in Fusion, sometimes resulting in a sluggish feel by comparison. Performance is another major difference, and it is linked to the fact that Fusion is still in beta. Several configuration dialogs include the sentence, “This device will be editable in a future release,” and there are some minor stability problems.
0 kommentar(er)
